Differences between revisions 1 and 2
Revision 1 as of 2012-02-20 20:54:10
Size: 855
Editor: jaromil
Revision 2 as of 2012-02-20 20:58:25
Size: 851
Editor: jaromil
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 3: Line 3:
Some notes taken from the http://secushare.com meeting about the socialswarm project based on GNUNet Some notes taken on a meeting of secushare people about the new http://socialswarm.net project
Line 5: Line 5:
(It can't sound any cooler, innit?) (It can not sound any cooler, innit?)

Software for democratic decision making, quickly reviewed

Some notes taken on a meeting of secushare people about the new http://socialswarm.net project

(It can not sound any cooler, innit?)

Oh and BTW, we take only open source into account. Who'd ever like to use a closed source voting system?



Written by Mako & co @ MIT

Liquid Feedback


Written by Pirates, used to win the Berlin city counsel elections



used on: https://enquetebeteiligung.de


20:59  <lynX> what i dont like about adhocracy is superficial: 1. it includes google scripts
21:00  <lynX> 2. people turn off delegations just so they dont need to worry about user registration

now, keep the flame up! :^D

SoftwareDemocracy (last edited 2012-02-21 00:09:44 by jaromil)