Differences between revisions 1 and 3 (spanning 2 versions)

Software for democratic decision making, quickly reviewed

Some notes taken on the first meeting of the socialswarm people.

(It can not sound any cooler, innit?)

Oh and BTW, we take only open source into account. Who'd ever like to use a closed source voting system?

Selectricity

http://selectricity.org/

Written by Mako & co @ MIT

Liquid Feedback

http://liquidfeedback.org/

Written by Pirates, used to win the Berlin city counsel elections

Adhocracy

http://code.adhocracy.de/

used on: https://enquetebeteiligung.de

notes:

20:59  <lynX> what i dont like about adhocracy is superficial: 1. it includes google scripts
21:00  <lynX> 2. people turn off delegations just so they dont need to worry about user registration
21:46  <codethief> lynx: but we're not here for trying out *liquid* democracy. we're here for decision making.
21:48  <lynX> ct: ack, delegations may not be needed for this job

now, keep the flame up! :^D

-  ⇤ ← Revision 1 as of 2012-02-20 20:54:10 → 
  Size: 855
  Editor: jaromil
  Comment:
+   ← Revision 3 as of 2012-02-20 21:20:11 → ⇥
  Size: 1027
  Editor: anonymous
  Comment:
-Deletions are marked like this.
+Additions are marked like this.
 Line 3:
-Some notes taken from the http://secushare.com meeting about the socialswarm project based on GNUNet
+Some notes taken on the first meeting of the [[http://socialswarm.net|socialswarm]] people.
 Line 5:
-(It can't sound any cooler, innit?)
+(It can not sound any cooler, innit?)
 Line 32:
+:46  <codethief> lynx: but we're not here for trying out *liquid* democracy. we're here for decision making.
21:48  <lynX> ct: ack, delegations may not be needed for this job