Differences between revisions 8 and 9
Revision 8 as of 2004-01-03 03:38:14
Size: 2599
Editor: anonymous
Comment:
Revision 9 as of 2004-01-03 04:29:03
Size: 2575
Editor: anonymous
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 16: Line 16:
     whereas rezound uses swapfiles of its own in the same directory as the audio file.
     In a typical dynebolic situation, the user has audio files on a big (windows) hard disk partition, but no swap,
     so sweep would not work on large files.
     Sweep is built with the GNU-head philosophy that lack of physical memory is a hardware problem :) -martin
whereas rezound uses swapfiles of its own in the same directory as the audio file.
In a typical dynebolic situation, the user has audio files on a big (windows) hard disk partition, but no swap,
so sweep would not work on large files.
Sweep is built with the GNU-head philosophy that lack of physical memory is a hardware problem : ( -martin
Line 21: Line 21:
     even when you run it as root. -martin even when you run it as root. -martin

Dynebolic Wishlist

This is a Dynebolic wishlist. If you want something added to Dynebolic, you can add it here. Please only add software that is free (as in speech).

Please say who you are that wants it, and why (say something about it).

Features

  • JACK Audio Connection Kit
  • X resolution change
  • multiple monitor support
  • kernel 2.6

Applications

  • Sweep, audio processor [http://sweep.sf.net/]

    • Sweep has a problem: it keeps all of the soundfile in RAM (or swap),

whereas rezound uses swapfiles of its own in the same directory as the audio file. In a typical dynebolic situation, the user has audio files on a big (windows) hard disk partition, but no swap, so sweep would not work on large files. Sweep is built with the GNU-head philosophy that lack of physical memory is a hardware problem : ( -martin

  • It also can't play audio continuuosly - the audio cuts out briefly when the display flips from page to page,

even when you run it as root. -martin

  • The user-interface is prettier than rezound. Do we care? -martin
  • The scratching feature is infantile. TerminatorX does this better. -martin

With JACK support

Only useful when JACK is available

See also the DyneBolicSoftwareList

WishList (last edited 2011-07-03 20:13:27 by anonymous)