Differences between revisions 1 and 21 (spanning 20 versions)
Revision 1 as of 2005-08-30 12:54:30
Size: 5488
Editor: jaromil
Comment:
Revision 21 as of 2005-10-13 18:38:41
Size: 9632
Editor: jaromil
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
#acl DyneGroup:read,write,admin,delete,revert All:
#pragma section-numbers on
Line 2: Line 4:
#acl DyneFoundationGroup:read,write,admin,delete,revert All: = Introduction =
Line 4: Line 6:
0. Introduction Source codes, or rather algorithms and algebra, are the tools of the digital craftsman in the modern age with over a thousand years of mathematical theories behind them. Only for little more than a quarter of a century have they acted as software.
Software is a means of creating art and communicating. It is a metaliterature which defines how meaning can be carried and (re)produced by multiplying the possibilities of communication.
Line 6: Line 9:
>I would first describe dyne org
Dyne.org ...... etc etc
Just as software is a means of metacommunication, so it represents a ''Parole'', deriving its execution from a ''Langue'': the grammatical and linguistic universe of the code.
Although many see the source code as merely an obscure cryptogram, it has an indirect effect on the way we communicate and even more on the efficiency with which we do so.
Line 9: Line 12:
The Netherlands Media Art Institute has focused since the year
2002 on the development of free and open source software.
> In that respect a long lasting relationship was stablished with this
> organisation resulting in a patronage for the dyne.org foundation
(Description of this history, from the begining up to the working together
with Jaromil)
Developing software means developing digital architectures:
their inhabitants have the right to own them and adapt them to their needs.
Line 16: Line 15:
1. Mission Statement The growth of the network rendered the non-propertarian alternative even more practical. What scholarly and popular writing alike denominate as a thing ("the Internet") is actually the name of a social condition: the fact that everyone in the network society is connected directly, without intermediation, to everyone else. The global interconnection of networks eliminated the bottleneck that had required a centralized software manufacturer to rationalize and distribute the outcome of individual innovation in the era of the mainframe.
Line 18: Line 17:
To promote the idea of open source and knowledge sharing
communities by research and development, production and distribution.
Software - whether executable programs, music, visual art, liturgy, weaponry, or what have you - consists of bitstreams, which although essentially indistinguishable are treated by a confusing multiplicity of legal categories. This multiplicity is unstable in the long term for reasons integral to the legal process. The unstable diversity of rules is caused by the need to distinguish among kinds of property interests in bitstreams. This need is primarily felt by those who stand to profit from the socially acceptable forms of monopoly created by treating ideas as property. Those of us who are worried about the social inequity and cultural hegemony created by this intellectually unsatisfying and morally repugnant regime are shouted down. Those doing the shouting believe that these property rules are necessary not from any overt yearning for life in Murdochworld - though a little luxurious co-optation is always welcome - but because the metaphor of incentives, which they take to be not just an image but an argument, proves that these rules - despite their lamentable consequences - are necessary if we are to make good software. The only way to continue to believe this is to ignore the facts. At the center of the digital revolution, with the executable bitstreams that make everything else possible, propertarian regimes not only do not make things better, they can make things radically worse.
Line 21: Line 19:
To provide new comunication tools, opening the partecipation to
online and onsite communities, leveraging the democratical access to
technology, lowering the economical requisites to its accesibility.
Property concepts, whatever else may be wrong with them, do not enable and have in fact retarded progress. In the network society, anarchism (or more properly, anti-possessive individualism) is a viable political philosophy. One main problem with anarchism as a social system is about transaction costs. But the digital revolution alters two aspects of political economy that have been otherwise invariant throughout human history. All software has zero marginal cost in the world of the Net, while the costs of social coordination have been so far reduced as to permit the rapid formation and dissolution of large-scale and highly diverse social groupings entirely without geographic limitation.
Line 25: Line 21:
To foster artistical research and creation with open source technologies,
exploring new forms of expression and interaction.
= History =
Line 28: Line 23:
To insure sustainability of free software development, also when '''Dyne.org''' appeared online in 2000 when Jaromil published his first
free and open source project: the ''Hasciicam'' software, setting
up a video stream made of letters and playing it out from the website.
His creation has been widely appreciated both for its artistical value
and for letting possible to broadcast live video using old hardware
from a slow network connection.

Since then Jaromil, collaborating with a growing network of
inventors, offered to the public new elaborated software for
media production, configuring dyne.org as a free software atelier,
a portal to Digital Creation and Media Art.

Ranging from radio makers, humanitarian organizations, video artists,
medical researchers, media activists and educators, a large amount of
people employed and redistributed dyne.org software worldwide, free
of charge, echoing to the freedom spirit of this autonomous initiative.

Openness, knowledge sharing and freedom of creation: these have been
the philosophycal principles guiding the evolution of dyne.org, hosting
creations that have been conceptualized not for a profit, but for their
role within society.

In 2003, Jaromil started collaborating with the Netherlands Media Art
Institute (NMAI) focusing on video streaming research and development,
as well being supported for the development of the vision mixer software
FreeJ. As a result of this activity a new video syncstarter technology
has been co-produced, released as free and open source, and succesfully
employed in a growing number of sync-started video installations.

In that respect a long lasting relationship was established with
this organisation resulting in a patronage for the dyne.org foundation,
which now starts to formally exist in 2005.



= Definitions of terms =

With the definition of '''Free and Open Source Software''' we refer
to all software licensed and distributed under the GNU General Public
License, as published by the Free Software Foundation. In fact, free
has to be intended as "Libre", free as of speech, not simply gratis,
coming with all possibilities to redistribute, modify and adapt the
software without any fee. From now on we'll refer to it with the acronym
'''FLOSS''' (free libre open source software).

'''FLOSS''' implies 4 fundamental freedoms:

 * The freedom to run the program, for any purpose.
 * The freedom to study how the program works, and adapt it to your needs.
 * The freedom to redistribute copies so you can help your neighbor.
 * The freedom to improve the program, and release your improvements to the public, so that the whole community benefits.

With '''dyne.org foundation''' we describe a non-profit organisation which
developes, employes and distributes FLOSS based software and hardware
solutions.

With '''non-profit''' we specify that all the revenues are reinvested in research,
development, employement and distribution of dyne.org software and hardware products.
The Netherlands Media Art Institute garanties that the overhead never
will be more than 5% of the turn over.



= Mission Statement =

DYNE.ORG stands

To promote the idea and practice of '''open source knowledge sharing within
civil society''': by fostering research, development, production
and distribution of FLOSS based solutions.

To open the partecipation to online and onsite communities, leveraging
the '''democratical and horizontal access to technology''', lowering the economical
requisites to its accessibility.

To foster employement of '''FLOSS in artistical creation''',
exploring new forms of expression and interaction and
insuring the long term conservation of digital artworks.

To insure '''sustainability of FLOSS development''', also when
Line 34: Line 108:
2. Definitions of terms = Missions of the foundation =
Line 36: Line 110:
2.1 With the definition of free and open source software we refer
to all software licensed and distributed under the GNU General Public
License, as published by the Free Software Foundation. In fact, free
has to be intended as "Libre", free as of speech, not simply gratis,
coming with all possibilities to redistribute, modify and adapt the
software without any fee. From now on we'll refer to it with the acronym
FLOSS (free libre open source software).
== Strategic mission ==
Line 44: Line 112:
2.2 With dyne.org foundation we describe a nonprofit organisation which
developes, employes and distributes FLOSS based software and hardware
solutions, especially related to art and comunication practices.
The community of FLOSS users still consists mostly of insiders,
while the potential of the developed software has reached a state of
high compatibility with license based programs, offering solutions
of higher quality in a growing number of cases.
Line 48: Line 117:
All the revenues are reinvested in research, employement and disribution. FLOSS solutions offer a wider degree of freedom: software that
can be adapted to specific needs and can evolve following the needs of
the community using it.

=== free software for the freedom of speech ===

Given the social relevance of software, it's an important strategical
goal for dyne.org to provide FLOSS based solutions, especially where
software gets employed for communication.

=== free software for net ecology ===

Development should be aware of all environmental issues connected to it and,
as such, keep the research focused, whenever possible, on recycling technical
equipment that is already existing, develop environmental friendly
systems, find ways to optimize the use of energy sources employed.
Line 51: Line 135:
= Operational mission =
Line 52: Line 137:
2. Strategic and operational goals == Development of software ==
Line 54: Line 139:
To open up new not for profit markets and to create and distribute open
source software to a wider audience.
Development of software is a core activity for dyne.org,
the foundation will seek ways to make the activity of developers
ustainable.
Line 57: Line 143:
      2.1 strategic goals Conform to the protocol of FLOSS, the software developed will be made
available online with its entire sourcecode.
Line 59: Line 146:
      To open up new not for profit markets == Deployement of software ==
Line 61: Line 148:
      The community of open source users still consists mostly of insiders,
      while the potential of the developed software has reached a state of
      high compatibility with license based programs.
      To enforce general customers to make use of free software we want to
      offer easy to use packages of applications at affordable prices.
Compilations of open source software will be brought together
on hardware (CD-ROM, computer boxes etc.) as well offered as plug
and play products and ad-hoc setups.
Line 67: Line 152:
      2.2 operational goals To compile, produce and distribute the hardware,
commercial calculations will be charged.
Line 69: Line 155:
      To create and distribute FLOSS to a wider audience.

      To guarantee the continuity of FLOSS creation and development we have
      to generate resources: money, people, infrastructure and knowledge.

      To distribute the software we have to create communication strategies,
      attractive products, marketing and distribution channels.

2.3 With dyne.org foundation we describe a nonprofit organisation which
distributes all research and creations for free, but also offers the most
easy acces to all members of this community, even to those that do not
contribute to research, at political prices.
The profit will be reinvested in research and development,
production and distribution and is excluded from any private profit.
Line 83: Line 159:
3.4 Donor and Patron membership program == Donor and Patron membership program ==
Line 85: Line 161:
      The dyne.org foundation will offer a Donor program for individual and
      a Patron program for societies and institutions willing to financially
      support the development of free software.
      These programs will include the provision of simple internet services
      aimed to tie up the community of donors as well to publish their
      benevolent support: email aliases, forums and online social games will
      consitute the online specular realization of a social club.

_______________
Contract between dyne.org and NIM
is about specific projects currently:
* Workshops - hour based
* Sync Starter (co-production)
* Video network (co-production)
* FreeJ (support by NIM)
______________

The Netherlands Media Art Institute garanties that the overhead never
will be more than 5% of the turn over.

3. products and combinations of markets (PCM's)

   3.1 Products

   3.2 Production of open source software

      In the ArtLab - the research centre of the Netherlands Media Art
      Institute (NMAI) - a long term development program for open source
      software will be established and connected with the Artists in
      Residence program. This program will be defined by the dyne.org
      Foundation and the NMAI and financed by both partners.

   3.3 Release of software - free of license.

      Conform to the protocol of the free libre open source movement
      the developed software will be made available online with its entire
      sourcecode.
      Next to it, compilations of open source software will brought together
      on hardware (CD-ROM, computer boxes etc.) as well offered as plug
      and play products. To compile, produce and distribute the hardware
      commercial calculations will be charged. The risk and profit is divided
      between both partners.
      The profit has by both to be reinvested in research and development,
      production and distribution and is excluded from any private profit.

      3.7 Marketing
                  To be sure of a break-even or profit result we have to
      investigate the market.
The Foundation will offer a Donor program for individuals and
a Patron program for organizations willing to financially
support the development of FLOSS based solutions.

1. Introduction

Source codes, or rather algorithms and algebra, are the tools of the digital craftsman in the modern age with over a thousand years of mathematical theories behind them. Only for little more than a quarter of a century have they acted as software. Software is a means of creating art and communicating. It is a metaliterature which defines how meaning can be carried and (re)produced by multiplying the possibilities of communication.

Just as software is a means of metacommunication, so it represents a Parole, deriving its execution from a Langue: the grammatical and linguistic universe of the code. Although many see the source code as merely an obscure cryptogram, it has an indirect effect on the way we communicate and even more on the efficiency with which we do so.

Developing software means developing digital architectures: their inhabitants have the right to own them and adapt them to their needs.

The growth of the network rendered the non-propertarian alternative even more practical. What scholarly and popular writing alike denominate as a thing ("the Internet") is actually the name of a social condition: the fact that everyone in the network society is connected directly, without intermediation, to everyone else. The global interconnection of networks eliminated the bottleneck that had required a centralized software manufacturer to rationalize and distribute the outcome of individual innovation in the era of the mainframe.

Software - whether executable programs, music, visual art, liturgy, weaponry, or what have you - consists of bitstreams, which although essentially indistinguishable are treated by a confusing multiplicity of legal categories. This multiplicity is unstable in the long term for reasons integral to the legal process. The unstable diversity of rules is caused by the need to distinguish among kinds of property interests in bitstreams. This need is primarily felt by those who stand to profit from the socially acceptable forms of monopoly created by treating ideas as property. Those of us who are worried about the social inequity and cultural hegemony created by this intellectually unsatisfying and morally repugnant regime are shouted down. Those doing the shouting believe that these property rules are necessary not from any overt yearning for life in Murdochworld - though a little luxurious co-optation is always welcome - but because the metaphor of incentives, which they take to be not just an image but an argument, proves that these rules - despite their lamentable consequences - are necessary if we are to make good software. The only way to continue to believe this is to ignore the facts. At the center of the digital revolution, with the executable bitstreams that make everything else possible, propertarian regimes not only do not make things better, they can make things radically worse.

Property concepts, whatever else may be wrong with them, do not enable and have in fact retarded progress. In the network society, anarchism (or more properly, anti-possessive individualism) is a viable political philosophy. One main problem with anarchism as a social system is about transaction costs. But the digital revolution alters two aspects of political economy that have been otherwise invariant throughout human history. All software has zero marginal cost in the world of the Net, while the costs of social coordination have been so far reduced as to permit the rapid formation and dissolution of large-scale and highly diverse social groupings entirely without geographic limitation.

2. History

Dyne.org appeared online in 2000 when Jaromil published his first free and open source project: the Hasciicam software, setting up a video stream made of letters and playing it out from the website. His creation has been widely appreciated both for its artistical value and for letting possible to broadcast live video using old hardware from a slow network connection.

Since then Jaromil, collaborating with a growing network of inventors, offered to the public new elaborated software for media production, configuring dyne.org as a free software atelier, a portal to Digital Creation and Media Art.

Ranging from radio makers, humanitarian organizations, video artists, medical researchers, media activists and educators, a large amount of people employed and redistributed dyne.org software worldwide, free of charge, echoing to the freedom spirit of this autonomous initiative.

Openness, knowledge sharing and freedom of creation: these have been the philosophycal principles guiding the evolution of dyne.org, hosting creations that have been conceptualized not for a profit, but for their role within society.

In 2003, Jaromil started collaborating with the Netherlands Media Art Institute (NMAI) focusing on video streaming research and development, as well being supported for the development of the vision mixer software FreeJ. As a result of this activity a new video syncstarter technology has been co-produced, released as free and open source, and succesfully employed in a growing number of sync-started video installations.

In that respect a long lasting relationship was established with this organisation resulting in a patronage for the dyne.org foundation, which now starts to formally exist in 2005.

3. Definitions of terms

With the definition of Free and Open Source Software we refer to all software licensed and distributed under the GNU General Public License, as published by the Free Software Foundation. In fact, free has to be intended as "Libre", free as of speech, not simply gratis, coming with all possibilities to redistribute, modify and adapt the software without any fee. From now on we'll refer to it with the acronym FLOSS (free libre open source software).

FLOSS implies 4 fundamental freedoms:

  • The freedom to run the program, for any purpose.
  • The freedom to study how the program works, and adapt it to your needs.
  • The freedom to redistribute copies so you can help your neighbor.
  • The freedom to improve the program, and release your improvements to the public, so that the whole community benefits.

With dyne.org foundation we describe a non-profit organisation which developes, employes and distributes FLOSS based software and hardware solutions.

With non-profit we specify that all the revenues are reinvested in research, development, employement and distribution of dyne.org software and hardware products. The Netherlands Media Art Institute garanties that the overhead never will be more than 5% of the turn over.

4. Mission Statement

DYNE.ORG stands

To promote the idea and practice of open source knowledge sharing within civil society: by fostering research, development, production and distribution of FLOSS based solutions.

To open the partecipation to online and onsite communities, leveraging the democratical and horizontal access to technology, lowering the economical requisites to its accessibility.

To foster employement of FLOSS in artistical creation, exploring new forms of expression and interaction and insuring the long term conservation of digital artworks.

To insure sustainability of FLOSS development, also when non-profiteable: being software a socially relevant media it should not be ideated and mantained only on the basis of its merchantability.

5. Missions of the foundation

5.1. Strategic mission

The community of FLOSS users still consists mostly of insiders, while the potential of the developed software has reached a state of high compatibility with license based programs, offering solutions of higher quality in a growing number of cases.

FLOSS solutions offer a wider degree of freedom: software that can be adapted to specific needs and can evolve following the needs of the community using it.

5.1.1. free software for the freedom of speech

Given the social relevance of software, it's an important strategical goal for dyne.org to provide FLOSS based solutions, especially where software gets employed for communication.

5.1.2. free software for net ecology

Development should be aware of all environmental issues connected to it and, as such, keep the research focused, whenever possible, on recycling technical equipment that is already existing, develop environmental friendly systems, find ways to optimize the use of energy sources employed.

6. Operational mission

6.1. Development of software

Development of software is a core activity for dyne.org, the foundation will seek ways to make the activity of developers ustainable.

Conform to the protocol of FLOSS, the software developed will be made available online with its entire sourcecode.

6.2. Deployement of software

Compilations of open source software will be brought together on hardware (CD-ROM, computer boxes etc.) as well offered as plug and play products and ad-hoc setups.

To compile, produce and distribute the hardware, commercial calculations will be charged.

The profit will be reinvested in research and development, production and distribution and is excluded from any private profit.

6.3. Donor and Patron membership program

The Foundation will offer a Donor program for individuals and a Patron program for organizations willing to financially support the development of FLOSS based solutions.

DyneStatute (last edited 2008-06-26 09:53:48 by anonymous)