|
Size: 832
Comment:
|
Size: 876
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 6: | Line 6: |
| * apache or ngingx? old but solid or new with an ongoing development? | * apache or ngingx? old but solid or new with an ongoing development? |
| Line 8: | Line 8: |
| I thought myself using a beast like apache to do load balancing was a bit like killing a fly with a nuke, so for I looked elsewhere for two solutions, reverse proxy or tcp-loadbalance? and then apt-cache search came to the rescue: | |
| Line 10: | Line 9: |
| [[/pound|Reverse proxy, load balancer and HTTPS front-end for Web servers]] | I thought myself using a beast like apache to do load balancing was a bit like killing a fly with a nuke, so for I looked elsewhere for two solutions, reverse proxy or tcp-loadbalance? and then apt-cache search came to the rescue: |
| Line 12: | Line 11: |
| * database: mysql?postgres?sqlite?ORACLE!?? | [[http://www.apsis.ch/pound/|Pound]] [[/pound|Pound Reverse proxy, load balancer and HTTPS front-end for Web servers]] * database: mysql?postgres?sqlite?ORACLE!?? |
Breaking the LAMP loop, alternative web serving methods
Lately I decided to look elsewhere than the usual "linux apache mysql php". Reading on docs makes me draw something like apache or ngingx as a load balancer front-end, the same as the backend adding lighttpd for fast streaming ofdata. This leave me more confused than before:
- apache or ngingx? old but solid or new with an ongoing development?
I thought myself using a beast like apache to do load balancing was a bit like killing a fly with a nuke, so for I looked elsewhere for two solutions, reverse proxy or tcp-loadbalance? and then apt-cache search came to the rescue:
Pound Pound Reverse proxy, load balancer and HTTPS front-end for Web servers
- database: mysql?postgres?sqlite?ORACLE!??